W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-interledger@w3.org > June 2016

Re: Ethereum: Deconstructing theDAO Heist

From: Daniel Bateman <7daniel77@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 11:40:57 +0100
Message-ID: <CAB1OcyGgU28uTK1b7PwukiHjh-SJZuKxYciEq1JrGr5ct=E6yw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tony Arcieri <bascule@gmail.com>
Cc: Interledger Community Group <public-interledger@w3.org>
On Jun 22, 2016 2:30 AM, "Tony Arcieri" <bascule@gmail.com> wrote:

If you have a simple "smart contract" language that allows you to build
escrows,

you can layer higher level smart contracts on top of the escrows in a way
that's out-of-band from the underlying protocol.
-- 
Tony Arcier

I like this idea as and would love to see it explored further Tony.

Daniel
On Jun 22, 2016 2:30 AM, "Tony Arcieri" <bascule@gmail.com> wrote:

> I published a blog post today that talked about Ethereum's Solidity as
> well as Interledger Crypto-conditions:
>
> https://tonyarcieri.com/a-tale-of-two-cryptocurrencies
>
> Unspoken in this post is the idea that instead of using protocol-level
> smart contracts like Solidity that "live on the blockchain", if you have a
> simple "smart contract" language that allows you to build escrows, you can
> layer higher level smart contracts on top of the escrows in a way that's
> out-of-band from the underlying protocol. Perhaps others are thinking along
> these lines?
>
> --
> Tony Arcieri
>
Received on Wednesday, 22 June 2016 10:41:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 22 June 2016 10:41:25 UTC