- From: Daniel Bateman <7daniel77@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 11:40:57 +0100
- To: Tony Arcieri <bascule@gmail.com>
- Cc: Interledger Community Group <public-interledger@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 22 June 2016 10:41:25 UTC
On Jun 22, 2016 2:30 AM, "Tony Arcieri" <bascule@gmail.com> wrote: If you have a simple "smart contract" language that allows you to build escrows, you can layer higher level smart contracts on top of the escrows in a way that's out-of-band from the underlying protocol. -- Tony Arcier I like this idea as and would love to see it explored further Tony. Daniel On Jun 22, 2016 2:30 AM, "Tony Arcieri" <bascule@gmail.com> wrote: > I published a blog post today that talked about Ethereum's Solidity as > well as Interledger Crypto-conditions: > > https://tonyarcieri.com/a-tale-of-two-cryptocurrencies > > Unspoken in this post is the idea that instead of using protocol-level > smart contracts like Solidity that "live on the blockchain", if you have a > simple "smart contract" language that allows you to build escrows, you can > layer higher level smart contracts on top of the escrows in a way that's > out-of-band from the underlying protocol. Perhaps others are thinking along > these lines? > > -- > Tony Arcieri >
Received on Wednesday, 22 June 2016 10:41:25 UTC