W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-interledger@w3.org > February 2016

Re: Crypto-condition Spec and Status

From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 20:32:43 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKaEYhLiwmr+J683xuU+RY=jzVuzB+veivC4Tk1L9MN+Eo9KLw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stefan Thomas <stefan@ripple.com>
Cc: Interledger Community Group <public-interledger@w3.org>
On 29 February 2016 at 20:07, Stefan Thomas <stefan@ripple.com> wrote:

> Just wanted to follow up on Thursday's discussion by posting a first draft
> and example implementation of the crypto-conditions spec:
>
>
> https://github.com/interledger/five-bells-condition/tree/feature/binary-merkle
>
> Also here are the slides I presented on Thursday. For those who weren't
> able to join, the presentation was recorded and we will seek to make the
> recording available as soon as we can.
>
> http://www.slideshare.net/Interledger/ilp-workshop-cryptoconditions
>

I like it!

But why, 'crypto' conditions, rather than 'verifiable' conditions -- it is
branding or do we want to limit the scope?


>
> - Stefan
>
Received on Monday, 29 February 2016 19:33:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 February 2016 19:33:15 UTC