- From: David Nicol <davidnicol@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 23:53:07 -0600
- To: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Cc: Adrian Hope-Bailie <adrian@hopebailie.com>, David Fuelling <dfuelling@sappenin.com>, Interledger Community Group <public-interledger@w3.org>
On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 7:16 PM, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 11 December 2016 at 02:06, David Nicol <davidnicol@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> FWIW, my current thoughts on this are to use SHA1 hashes for >> everything. Following attempting to allow various sorts of identities >> with "identity strings," normalizing on hashes of some constant >> followed by the identifying string gives an interchangable 160-bit >> token that can be used without worrying about what it represents until >> you care. > > > In what context do you want to use SHA1 hashes? Mainline DHT cloud storage. > Is there a path to interoperability? Thanks to the interledger protocol project, ABSOLUTELY. -- "Teaching radical novelties is our main safeguard against dictatorships" -- Edsger W. Dijkstra
Received on Sunday, 11 December 2016 05:53:41 UTC