W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-interledger@w3.org > December 2016

Re: A Survey of ILP Account Identifiers?

From: Adrian Hope-Bailie <adrian@hopebailie.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 23:08:30 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+eFz_+QRPLBUOJv4mgaYqAiR5pz9y77iNQxDsx9e3d3-OyFkA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
Cc: David Fuelling <dfuelling@sappenin.com>, Interledger Community Group <public-interledger@w3.org>
> it does a reverse lookup on my http url and finds my crypto addresses.

Can you expand on this?

Reverse lookups imply you need to crawl all known URLs and index the
identifiers that are linked to them and then also have a strategy for
resolving duplicates (i.e. What if two different Web IDs claimed your email
address as their own?)

On 4 December 2016 at 22:36, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On 4 December 2016 at 19:55, David Fuelling <dfuelling@sappenin.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hey All,
>>
>> There seems to be several different ways to define the format and
>> characteristics of an ILP Ledger Account identifier (e.g., ILP Address,
>> email address, URL, etc).
>>
>> For me, this has led to some confusion as I've tried to reason about when
>> and where to use which style of identifier.  So, I created the following
>> wiki page to try to and collect my thoughts and formalize my understanding
>> of these different proposed identifiers, when to use them, and why:
>>
>> https://github.com/fluid-money/ilp-connector-java/wiki/A-
>> Survey-of-Interledger-Account-Identifiers
>>
>> While I feel like this has clarified some thing for me, it has prompted a
>> few more questions, which I tried to outline in the last section called
>> "FAQ" -- I provided some strawman answers and counter-answers in there, but
>> I'm curious if anyone has input/opinions/clarifications/corrections
>> about what I've put together overall.  Feel free to share your thoughts,
>> and if there's any interest I'd be happy to move this page over to the
>> Interledger project on Github if people find it useful.
>>
>
> It might be easier to explain how I do this.
>
> My identifer is a primary key which is an HTTP URI.  In general it is
> hidden from the user, but it may show up in places, much like how URLs
> appear in the address bar of a browser.  The user doesnt really need to
> know what it is.  Just that it works.
>
> Tied to may URL is my name (used for personalizing apps), my email address
> (which could be used as a short hand to log in), my crypto addresses (used
> to send crypto coins), my wallets (which are like ledgers and give you
> instructions on how to send credits), my keys (used for PKI and login) and
> pretty much any other info I want.
>
> Lets say you want to send me some crypto coins, you send to my email
> address, it does a reverse lookup on my http url and finds my crypto
> addresses.
>
> Lets say you want to send me some webcredits, you similarly get my
> wallets, then if you have a positive balance, it will give you an API
> endpoint or inboxl that you can send credits to.  My agent will pick up the
> payment and make the transfer.
>
> Same could apply sending money from phone to phone, via irc or internet
> chat etc. lots of other use cases present themselves.
>
> This is how the web / linked data was designed to work, it gives you not
> just human readable flows, but machine readable flows so that simple steps
> such as payments can be performed by machines / agents.  Leading to complex
> and innovative use cases.
>
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> david
>>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 7 December 2016 21:09:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 December 2016 21:09:05 UTC