W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-interledger@w3.org > August 2016

Re: [Ledger] AGENDA - Community Call - Wed 24 August - 3pm UTC

From: Manuel Polo <mistermx@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 10:44:35 +0200
Message-ID: <CAPxo6L0LdcAyXOwEzcWpmHe1_wk1B-bkZFpRvWUbyvRO+0NxAQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adrian Hope-Bailie <adrian@hopebailie.com>
Cc: Interledger Community Group <public-interledger@w3.org>, Interledger Mailing List - IETF <ledger@ietf.org>
Hi!

Would be great to have an implementation(connectors,ledger plug-ins etc)
and or initiatives table somewhere (interledger.org or at least github.com)
to be aware of: language - repos - maintainer/s.

What do you think?

2016-08-24 15:39 GMT+02:00 Adrian Hope-Bailie <adrian@hopebailie.com>:

> Thanks Yaron!
>
> I believe there is a Go implementation in the works from someone in the
> community
>
> On 24 August 2016 at 15:31, Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> *Binary format status*
>>
>> - Plan to encapsulate most of it in ilp-core, so everyone else doesn't
>> have to worry about it.
>> - We had previously thought that we would reimplement ILP in every
>> language. Now adopted a more nuanced view - need implementations in
>> JavaScript (browsers, web), C (support most languages through bindings;
>> embedded systems), Java (to support JVM), C# (to support .NET), Python
>> (large amount of interest). But not much more for now.
>> - Javascript and Java have started on GitHub looking for others
>>
>>
>> Hi Adrian,
>>
>> C is notoriously unsuitable for security-sensitive code. As an outside
>> observer, I would suggest that you look at alternatives. My favorite would
>> be Go with a thin C shim on top. A more realistic alternative would be C++
>> with a C interface.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>     Yaron
>>
>
>


-- 
Manuel Polo

http://about.me/mrmx
Received on Friday, 26 August 2016 13:13:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 26 August 2016 13:13:36 UTC