- From: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 15:07:00 -0600
- To: Ben Peters <Ben.Peters@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "chaals@yandex-team.ru" <chaals@yandex-team.ru>, "White, Jason J" <jjwhite@ets.org>, Olli Pettay <olli@pettay.fi>, "public-editing-tf@w3.org" <public-editing-tf@w3.org>, "public-indie-ui@w3.org" <public-indie-ui@w3.org>, Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@apple.com>, Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>
- Message-ID: <OF6BE3B9EA.727A6C31-ON86257D86.0073EBE2-86257D86.0073FF22@us.ibm.com>
Ben,
Is it because other people are already using it?
Rich
Rich Schwerdtfeger
From: Ben Peters <Ben.Peters@microsoft.com>
To: Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
Cc: "chaals@yandex-team.ru" <chaals@yandex-team.ru>, "White, Jason
J" <jjwhite@ets.org>, Olli Pettay <olli@pettay.fi>,
"public-editing-tf@w3.org" <public-editing-tf@w3.org>,
"public-indie-ui@w3.org" <public-indie-ui@w3.org>, Ryosuke Niwa
<rniwa@apple.com>, Travis Leithead
<travis.leithead@microsoft.com>
Date: 11/04/2014 02:51 PM
Subject: RE: Need Agreement on Terminology
Two reasons some people don’t like “Intentions”:
· http://www.w3.org/TR/web-intents/
·
http://developer.android.com/reference/android/content/Intent.html
From: Richard Schwerdtfeger [mailto:schwer@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 4, 2014 12:16 PM
To: Ben Peters
Cc: chaals@yandex-team.ru; White, Jason J; Olli Pettay;
public-editing-tf@w3.org; public-indie-ui@w3.org; Ryosuke Niwa; Travis
Leithead
Subject: Re: Need Agreement on Terminology
I am not quite following why intention based invents is a problem. The
events reflect the intent of the user.
Rich Schwerdtfeger
Inactive hide details for Ben Peters ---11/04/2014 01:18:22 PM---Would
Input Events be confusing because we already have those Ben Peters
---11/04/2014 01:18:22 PM---Would Input Events be confusing because we
already have those in DOM Events? Travis, Ryosuke- you ha
From: Ben Peters <Ben.Peters@microsoft.com>
To: "chaals@yandex-team.ru" <chaals@yandex-team.ru>, "White, Jason J" <
jjwhite@ets.org>, Olli Pettay <olli@pettay.fi>, "public-editing-tf@w3.org"
<public-editing-tf@w3.org>, "public-indie-ui@w3.org" <
public-indie-ui@w3.org>, Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>,
Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@apple.com>
Date: 11/04/2014 01:18 PM
Subject: Re: Need Agreement on Terminology
Would Input Events be confusing because we already have those in DOM
Events?
Travis, Ryosuke- you have both expressed a distaste for "Intention", can
you elaborate on that here?
________________________________________
From: chaals@yandex-team.ru <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
Sent: Tuesday, November 4, 2014 10:15 AM
To: Ben Peters; White, Jason J; Olli Pettay; public-editing-tf@w3.org;
public-indie-ui@w3.org
Subject: Re: Need Agreement on Terminology
04.11.2014, 18:51, "Ben Peters" <Ben.Peters@microsoft.com>:
> The question really is should the events be the "Intention" of the user,
the "Action" of the browser/site, or the "Command" itself?
They represent the intention of the user.
(And while I could argue with Olli over the use of device events, input
events seems fine to me too).
cheers
--
Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex
chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: graycol.gif
Received on Tuesday, 4 November 2014 21:07:35 UTC