- From: Ben Peters <Ben.Peters@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 01:14:38 +0000
- To: Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@apple.com>
- CC: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>, "White, Jason J" <jjwhite@ets.org>, "chaals@yandex-team.ru" <chaals@yandex-team.ru>, "Olli Pettay" <olli@pettay.fi>, "public-editing-tf@w3.org" <public-editing-tf@w3.org>, "public-indie-ui@w3.org" <public-indie-ui@w3.org>, Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>, Edward O'Connor <eoconnor@apple.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
I look at The Spec Formerly Known as the Intentions Explainer as the birth of a new design pattern, which I hereby dub Responsive Input :-). It is the corollary to Responsive Layout in that it is meant to work regardless of locale, device, or modality. How does everyone feel about calling them Responsive Input Events? Let there be Responsive Design! Ben From: Ryosuke Niwa [mailto:rniwa@apple.com] Sent: Monday, December 8, 2014 4:09 PM To: Ben Peters Cc: Richard Schwerdtfeger; White, Jason J; chaals@yandex-team.ru; Olli Pettay; public-editing-tf@w3.org; public-indie-ui@w3.org; Travis Leithead; Edward O'Connor; Maciej Stachowiak Subject: Re: Need Agreement on Terminology Can we just adopt the term “action” in replace of “intention”?
Received on Tuesday, 9 December 2014 01:15:13 UTC