- From: T.V Raman <raman@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 15:41:01 -0700
- To: jcraig@apple.com
- Cc: raman@google.com, schwer@us.ibm.com, jason@jasonjgw.net, public-indie-ui@w3.org
Right re user-agent header, and we all see the mess we have
collectively made of it -- every user-agent tries to look like
every other user-agent:-)
James Craig writes:
> Every page request is sent with browser and OS version. This is no different, and no one is forcing a a user to expose anything. This will be triggered in rare circumstances with a user-configurable settings and confirmation dialogs similar to location sharing dialogs.
>
> On Jun 21, 2013, at 3:30 PM, raman@google.com (T.V Raman) wrote:
>
> > 1+. In general, these interfaces should never expose details of
> > the runtime to this degree --
> >
> > Richard Schwerdtfeger writes:
> >> We are really stepping on privacy issues be forcing the user to have to expose the fact they are using a screen reader to be able to use a site.
> >>
> >> Sent from my iPad
> >>
> >> On Jun 4, 2013, at 1:00 PM, "James Craig" <jcraig@apple.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Jun 4, 2013, at 1:43 AM, Jason White <jason@jasonjgw.net> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> James Craig <jcraig@apple.com> wrote:
> >>>>> What about adding type tokens, such as "screenreader", "magnifier", etc.
> >>>>
> >>>> Excellent. An AT can support more than one function.
> >>>
> >>> On second thought, I don't think that will work. Part of the reason for splitting these up into separate WebIDL dictionaries is to support a hasFeature() detection method
> >> similar to DOMImplementation.hasFeature().
> >>>
> >>> Just to make sure you're seeing the entire WebIDL blocks, you should be viewing the editor's drafts in a JavaScript enabled browser.
> >>>
> >>> So for this existing WebIDL dictionary…
> >>>
> >>> dictionary ScreenReaderSettings {
> >>> boolean? screenReaderActive = null;
> >>> DOMString? screenReaderName = null;
> >>> DOMString? screenReaderVersion = null;
> >>> };
> >>>
> >>> …an author could do something like this: (Specific syntax TBD)
> >>>
> >>> if (window.settings.hasFeature('ScreenReaderSettings')) {
> >>> var isScreenReaderActive = window.settings.valueForKey('screenReaderActive');
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> I think we'd want to set up a different *feature* altogether for 'MagnifierSettings' to standardize properties like zoom level, zoom window size, center point, etc.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
Received on Friday, 21 June 2013 22:41:29 UTC