- From: T.V Raman <raman@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 15:41:01 -0700
- To: jcraig@apple.com
- Cc: raman@google.com, schwer@us.ibm.com, jason@jasonjgw.net, public-indie-ui@w3.org
Right re user-agent header, and we all see the mess we have collectively made of it -- every user-agent tries to look like every other user-agent:-) James Craig writes: > Every page request is sent with browser and OS version. This is no different, and no one is forcing a a user to expose anything. This will be triggered in rare circumstances with a user-configurable settings and confirmation dialogs similar to location sharing dialogs. > > On Jun 21, 2013, at 3:30 PM, raman@google.com (T.V Raman) wrote: > > > 1+. In general, these interfaces should never expose details of > > the runtime to this degree -- > > > > Richard Schwerdtfeger writes: > >> We are really stepping on privacy issues be forcing the user to have to expose the fact they are using a screen reader to be able to use a site. > >> > >> Sent from my iPad > >> > >> On Jun 4, 2013, at 1:00 PM, "James Craig" <jcraig@apple.com> wrote: > >> > >>> On Jun 4, 2013, at 1:43 AM, Jason White <jason@jasonjgw.net> wrote: > >>> > >>>> James Craig <jcraig@apple.com> wrote: > >>>>> What about adding type tokens, such as "screenreader", "magnifier", etc. > >>>> > >>>> Excellent. An AT can support more than one function. > >>> > >>> On second thought, I don't think that will work. Part of the reason for splitting these up into separate WebIDL dictionaries is to support a hasFeature() detection method > >> similar to DOMImplementation.hasFeature(). > >>> > >>> Just to make sure you're seeing the entire WebIDL blocks, you should be viewing the editor's drafts in a JavaScript enabled browser. > >>> > >>> So for this existing WebIDL dictionary… > >>> > >>> dictionary ScreenReaderSettings { > >>> boolean? screenReaderActive = null; > >>> DOMString? screenReaderName = null; > >>> DOMString? screenReaderVersion = null; > >>> }; > >>> > >>> …an author could do something like this: (Specific syntax TBD) > >>> > >>> if (window.settings.hasFeature('ScreenReaderSettings')) { > >>> var isScreenReaderActive = window.settings.valueForKey('screenReaderActive'); > >>> } > >>> > >>> I think we'd want to set up a different *feature* altogether for 'MagnifierSettings' to standardize properties like zoom level, zoom window size, center point, etc. > >>> > >>> > >>
Received on Friday, 21 June 2013 22:41:29 UTC