- From: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 20:11:03 -0600
- To: jcraig@apple.com, public-indie-ui@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF8C586918.70C894BF-ON86257AED.00050141-86257AED.000C5B8C@us.ibm.com>
Suggested Changes and Comments: Abstract: <change> This specification, in conjunction with the User Context Module, is intended address the problem of device-, OS-, and localization-independent control of web content, including custom widgets. See the introduction for background and usage examples. </change> <to> This specification, in conjunction with the User Context Module, is intended address the problem of device-independent, OS-neutral, and localization-independent control of web content, including custom widgets. See the introduction for background and usage examples. </to> 1.1 Background: Paragraph 1: <change> alternate assistive technologies including </change> <to> assistive technologies that use alternate forms of input such as </to> 1.2 Goals: Bullet 1: <change< agnostic</change> <to> input agnostic </to> Bullet 3: A comment: Just wanted to point out that another group is doing Pointer events which are more agnostic. We might want to limit this to command and control functions. General change: Both sections 2 and 3 should say "This section is normative." as the preceding sections say they are non-normative. ... or you should separate these sections into a normative part of the spec. Either way would be fine. 3. UI Request Events Are there going to be incidents where the request event is NOT sent to the element with the Point of Regard. IOW should the Point of Regard always be moved to make all requests? We should look into this. 3.1.3 UIRequestEventType Each of these are separated by a black and red color. I am not sure why we are differentiating by color. e.g.: Undo Request undorequest If we are differentiating by color that is an accessibility issue. Why don't we just get rid of the first part and have undorequest? You have the definition following it. 3.2.1 UIManipulationRequest We need to prototype this to know whether we have this right. Glossary: Point-of-Regard: The definition should start out as the point of user focus within which UI actions are directed. ... and then follow with the rest of it. This is the extent of my comments for this first working draft. It is a good first draft. We need to dig into these deeper and provide greater specificity such as scrolling increments. We are all aware of that.
Received on Tuesday, 8 January 2013 02:12:09 UTC