- From: Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 10:01:41 +0000
- To: Bob Lund <B.Lund@CableLabs.com>, Brendan Long <B.Long@cablelabs.com>, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- CC: "public-inbandtracks@w3.org" <public-inbandtracks@w3.org>
+1 to mode="UARendered". Nigel On 29/09/2014 16:53, "Bob Lund" <B.Lund@CableLabs.com> wrote: > > >On 9/29/14, 9:27 AM, "Brendan Long" <B.Long@cablelabs.com> wrote: > >>On 09/28/2014 04:11 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: >>>>> It's likely better exposed add a video track with burnt-in captions. >>>>>I'd >>>>> recommend that's how it would be shown in the track list. When >>>>>activated, >>>>> both the default video track and the captions track would then be >>>>>rendered. >>>> This pushes the interface complexity somewhere else, but not somewhere >>>> helpful! I'd argue that the spec should get as close as possible to >>>>matching >>>> the media element model and using text tracks for this purpose is >>>>better >>>> than not doing so. >>> Why is it not helpful? From the JS and user's point of view, that's >>> exactly what such a track is: a video track with burnt in captions. >>> Since it's now exposed in the list of video tracks, it can be selected >>> and activated. That's all that's required for such a track. That's as >>> useful as it gets, isn't it? >>Wouldn't exposing captions as a video track + burned in captions create >>weird cases when you have multiple video tracks (multiple camera angles >>for example)? If the captions apply to all of the videos, then you'll >>have an explosion of video tracks instead of a simple list of video >>tracks and a simple list of captions to go with it. >> > >The current HTML spec doesn¹t support a cue-less text track very well so >treating it as a video track with burned-in text is an alternative. This >could result in a large number of these tracks for media resources with N >video tracks and M cue-less text tracks (N x M). > >Another alternative is to enhance text track semantics to better >accommodate cue-less text tracks. One could define a new text track mode, >e.g. ³UARendered" defined as ³Indicates that the text track is active, the >user agent is actively displaying the data in the track but no cues are >active and no events are fired.² > > >The only legal modes for such a track would be ³disabled² or ³UARendered². > > >
Received on Tuesday, 30 September 2014 10:02:15 UTC