- From: Bob Lund <B.Lund@CableLabs.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 19:04:20 +0000
- To: "Clift, Graham" <Graham.Clift@am.sony.com>, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, "Ota, Takaaki" <Takaaki.Ota@am.sony.com>
- CC: "public-inbandtracks@w3.org" <public-inbandtracks@w3.org>
On 3/17/14, 11:49 AM, "Clift, Graham" <Graham.Clift@am.sony.com> wrote: >It seems like for TextTrack creation in MPEG-2 TS that detection of the >metadata private section is only through the stream_type code present in >the PMT and that the payload_start_indicator==1 is only relevant to >populating the DataCues that get added to the TextTrack later. Yes, youıre right - the payload_start_indicator should not be used to determine metadata track; only the stream_type. > Hence the patch and the wiki page seem incorrect to me when they suggest >the payload_start_indicator==1 is used to detect that there is a stream >type of kind metadata private section. > >This also raises another question which is how are the metadata private >section table cues are generated. If the private section table is >delivered as a payload split across multiple TS packets then presumably >the UA must use the payload_start_indicator bit to begin to assemble the >payload into the single private section table. However, when does the cue >get created unless the UA knows how many packets to expect? The private_section_length field can be used by the UA to know when itıs received the last packet for an instance of the table. > My understanding is the UA does not know how many packets to expect so >maybe it generates the cue only when a subsequent >payload_satart_indicator==1 is detected. However, this could be long past >the time when this cue is relevant to the media playback time. > >Regards > >Graham Clift > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Silvia Pfeiffer [mailto:silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com] >Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 1:21 AM >To: Bob Lund >Cc: public-inbandtracks@w3.org >Subject: Re: Submitted HTML5 bugs and an MSE observation > >On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 5:56 AM, Bob Lund <B.Lund@cablelabs.com> wrote: >> Hi CG, >> >> I have submitted the following HTML5 bugs 24986, 24977, 25005 and >> 25044, reflecting the discussion we've had on the mailing list. > >[HTML editor hat on:] >I've provided feedback and proposed patches in each of these bugs. >Please review. > >Regards, >Silvia. > > >
Received on Monday, 17 March 2014 19:04:47 UTC