- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 15:46:13 -0500
- To: Bob Lund <B.Lund@CableLabs.com>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, "public-inbandtracks@w3.org" <public-inbandtracks@w3.org>
- CC: "Mark Vickers @ Comcast" <mark_vickers@cable.comcast.com>, Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com>, Philipp Hoschka <ph@w3.org>, Olivier Thereaux <olivier.thereaux@bbc.co.uk>, Daniel Davis <ddavis@w3.org>, Karen Myers <karen@w3.org>, Alan Bird <abird@w3.org>
On 11/07/2013 02:42 PM, Bob Lund wrote: > HTML WG Chairs, > > Would the Chairs recommend that the In-Band Tracks extension be drafted > in a CG or in the HTML WG? Sorry for the delay in responding (I volunteered to take this, and somehow it fell off my radar). In general, the chairs don't make a recommendation on such things, but will provide support should you (collectively) decide to pursue development and/or publication inside the HTML WG. Please let us know if this is something you wish to pursue. - Sam Ruby > The Inbandtracks CG[1] was recently created to define standard mapping > between HTML5 and common media transport formats (MPEG–2 TS, WebM, MP4, > Ogg). As stated in [1], the goal of this specification is to foster Web > app interoperability across HTML UA implementations. The HTML5 CR spec > suggests the need for such additional specification [2], at least in the > case of inband text tracks. [3] is an example of an additional > specification that was created by CableLabs and is referenced by DLNA > guidelines for use of HTML5. It is the preference of several HTML WG and > DLNA members, as well as CableLabs, that [3] and equivalent specs for > other media resources be done within W3C. > > Thanks, > Bob Lund > > [1] http://www.w3.org/community/inbandtracks/ > [2] > http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/embedded-content-0.html#sourcing-in-band-text-tracks > [3] http://www.cablelabs.com/specifications/CL-SP-HTML5-MAP-I02-120510.pdf
Received on Monday, 20 January 2014 20:46:51 UTC