- From: Klaus Weidner <klausw@chromium.org>
- Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 15:36:11 -0800
- To: public-immersive-web@w3.org
Received on Friday, 13 December 2019 23:36:28 UTC
We briefly discussed this in the last CG call, see minutes at
https://www.w3.org/2019/11/26-immersive-web-minutes.html#item03 and the
related issue https://github.com/immersive-web/dom-overlays/issues/6.
As requested in the call, does anyone have objections to using the feature
name "dom-overlay" for this feature?
We don't seem to have much precedent for how feature names should relate to
methods or attributes added to pre-existing entities such as XRSessionInit.
To avoid potential collisions with other future features, I've been using
the feature name as a prefix in the draft spec
<https://klausw.github.io/dom-overlays/index.html>, i.e.
{{XRSessionInit/domOverlay}} for the new initialization attribute, and
{{XRSession/domOverlayState}} for current properties. Are people OK with
using this approach for other features also, where appropriate?
Received on Friday, 13 December 2019 23:36:28 UTC