- From: Klaus Weidner <klausw@chromium.org>
- Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 15:36:11 -0800
- To: public-immersive-web@w3.org
Received on Friday, 13 December 2019 23:36:28 UTC
We briefly discussed this in the last CG call, see minutes at https://www.w3.org/2019/11/26-immersive-web-minutes.html#item03 and the related issue https://github.com/immersive-web/dom-overlays/issues/6. As requested in the call, does anyone have objections to using the feature name "dom-overlay" for this feature? We don't seem to have much precedent for how feature names should relate to methods or attributes added to pre-existing entities such as XRSessionInit. To avoid potential collisions with other future features, I've been using the feature name as a prefix in the draft spec <https://klausw.github.io/dom-overlays/index.html>, i.e. {{XRSessionInit/domOverlay}} for the new initialization attribute, and {{XRSession/domOverlayState}} for current properties. Are people OK with using this approach for other features also, where appropriate?
Received on Friday, 13 December 2019 23:36:28 UTC