Re: Action Required: CFC, moving to a Living Spec Model for WebXR.

+1

On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 1:12 PM Jennifer Strickland <jstrickland@mitre.org>
wrote:

> +1
>
>
>
> *From: *Laszlo Gombos <l.gombos@samsung.com>
> *Date: *Thursday, May 9, 2024 at 10:56 PM
> *To: *Ada Rose Cannon <adarose@apple.com>, public-immersive-web-wg@w3.org
> <public-immersive-web-wg@w3.org>
> *Subject: *[EXT] Re: Action Required: CFC, moving to a Living Spec Model
> for WebXR.
>
> I support this proposal as well. Laszlo ---------- Forwarded message
> --------- From: Brandon Jones <bajones@ google. com> Date: Wed, May 8,
> 2024 at 5: 24 PM Subject: Re: Action Required: CFC, moving to a Living Spec
> Model for WebXR. To:
>
> I support this proposal as well.
>
> Laszlo
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: *Brandon Jones* <bajones@google.com>
> Date: Wed, May 8, 2024 at 5:24 PM
> Subject: Re: Action Required: CFC, moving to a Living Spec Model for WebXR.
> To: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@meta.com>
> Cc: Ada Rose Cannon <adarose@apple.com>, public-immersive-web-wg@w3.org <
> public-immersive-web-wg@w3.org>
>
>
>
> I'm also in support of this proposal.
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 1:27 PM Rik Cabanier <cabanier@meta.com> wrote:
>
> I support this proposal
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Ada Rose Cannon <adarose@apple.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 8, 2024 12:08 PM
> *To:* public-immersive-web-wg@w3.org <public-immersive-web-wg@w3.org>
> *Subject:* Action Required: CFC, moving to a Living Spec Model for WebXR.
>
>
>
> Hi Everyone, Following the discussion at TPAC (minutes) I am putting
> forward the proposal for the WebXR Device API core spec and the WebXR
> layers spec to move to a living spec model where there will be continuous
> candidate recommendations published
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
>
>
> Following the discussion at TPAC (minutes
> <https://www.w3.org/2024/03/26-immersive-web-minutes.html#t07>) I am
> putting forward the proposal for the WebXR Device API core spec and the
> WebXR layers spec to move to a living spec model where there will be
> continuous candidate recommendations published with no expectation that the
> spec will ever be fully “complete”. HTML follows a similar model. This
> model makes sense for these 2 specs because they both need to deal with the
> ever changing requirements of evolving XR hardware.
>
>
>
> These specs will still be limited to what is in the charter and candidate
> recommendations will be published at intervals it won’t be a new
> recommendation with every merged pull request but they will be updated
> within a timely manner after a substantive change and will undergo the
> various reviews.
>
>
>
> Please reply stating whether or not you approve or reject this proposal.
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
>
>
> Ada Rose Cannon, Ayşegül Yonet and Chris Wilson
>
> Immersive Web Chairs
>
>