- From: r12a <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 06:54:45 +0000
- To: public-iip-admin@w3.org
On 04/02/2020 17:39, r12a wrote: > We are experimenting with a new approach for creating content for the > gap-analysis work. I've now created the new documents and issues to cover the points that were already there. However, i removed or changed content related to quotations that was out of date. (There's no proper diff for those changes, but i don't think that's an issue.) So, from now on, if we want to change the content of the gap-analysis doc, it's a question of raising a new issue (if it's a new topic), or editing (or proposing edits for) an existing issue.* The use of labels in the GH repo enables us to examine the content in new ways. For example, this link shows all content related to grapheme/word segmentation in a way that allows us to compare what content we have across languages: https://github.com/w3c/iip/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3Ai%3Agrapheme_word_segmentation ri
Received on Wednesday, 5 February 2020 06:54:48 UTC