RE: A proposed Internet Draft for implementing http content negotiation by application profiles from Svensson, Lars on 2017-04-26 (public-ietf-w3c@w3.org from April 2017)

From: Svensson, Lars <L.Svensson@dnb.de>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 08:39:45 +0000
To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, "public-ietf-w3c@w3.org" <public-ietf-w3c@w3.org>
CC: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>, "Ruben Verborgh (ruben.verborgh@ugent.be)" <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>, "Herbert Van de Sompel (hvdsomp@gmail.com)" <hvdsomp@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <24637769D123E644A105A0AF0E1F92EF010D2D1D51@dnbf-ex1.AD.DDB.DE>

Larry,

On Tuesday, April 25, 2017 9:57 PM, Larry Masinter [mailto:masinter@adobe.com] wrote:

> As long as  you're surveying existing content negotiation features,
> Consider RFC 2295, 2703 combined with RFC 2534. 2938.

Thanks for those pointers, I shall definitely have a look at them.

> The general idea of a media feature is something that is orthogonal
> to the MIME type.

Just a terminology question: What exactly is a media feature?

Thanks,

Lars

Received on Wednesday, 26 April 2017 08:40:25 UTC