- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 11:52:21 +1000
- To: public-ietf-w3c <public-ietf-w3c@w3.org>
# IETF W3C Liaison Meeting - June 2016 Present: Mark Nottingham, Philippe Le Hegaret, Wendy Seltzer ## webauthn and webcrypto progress Wendy: Webcrypto is in candidate rec phase and testing phase. Web Authentication is building on token binding and FIDO. Rapid progess. Setting up an IANA registry for authenticator registration. Mark: we set up a registry for Mike West for CSP extensions. Nice to see W3C creating registries. Wendy: we're doing the Web API for athenticator through the client for the party. Mark any cross participation? Wendy: Yes, Dirk Balfanz comes to mind (also Tony Nadalin, Jeff Hodges) ## webauthn authenticator extension registry Wendy: Jeff Hodges took the action to take that started. Mark: if he needs help, I'm happy to help. Wendy: also aiming to beat W3C record from charter to REC. ## URL plh: work at W3C stopped a year ago. Lack of interest from implementers to go and fix their bugs. They were satisfied enough with what they had. plh: Work ongoing at WHATWG. There may be some interest from server side. mnot: We ask for errata. There's a place for API for URLs, algorithm for parsing a string into a URL. ## HTTP.next plh: I saw you raising performance issues for HTTP/2 mnot: pretty good implementation, best practices and extensions emerging. cache-digest, server authentication, connection reuse. QUIC drumbeat increasing, proposed WG-forming BOF in Berlin. Proposed charter starting from QUIC, with 18-month window (faster than HTTP/2). Mark: W3C doesn't need to be involved more. They're not changing semantics but it's leaking a bit. ## Fetch plh: SRI went to PR with a normative reference to Fetch. TimBL still has concerns about the security model embodied in Fetch but no one knows how to do better. Wendy: We have more WebAppSec dependencies, so we're looking for ways to make the reference more acceptable. Mark: we're confortable with it at the moment. keeping an eye on it. ## IETF 96 & W3C TPAC 2016 Mark isn't sure he can be in Lisbon. Wendy will be in Berlin. ## JUSTFONT Mark: we're waiting on Chris on the new draft. Next step will be to publish, get confirmation from mailing list, then send to IESG if no objection. ## WebRTC Mark: anything specific there? Plh: didn't check with Dom. No news on our front. Mark: I think we're good. ## Cookies Mark: HTTP WG is going to open up the cookies spec and revise. Solliciting proposals, looking for implementers interest before moving forward. We adopted 3 drafts so far, 2 more are in play. same-site cookies, cookie prefixes; considering: cookie priorities Wendy: I'll point some people toward that work. -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Tuesday, 7 June 2016 01:52:54 UTC