- From: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
- Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2014 19:05:48 +0000
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- CC: "public-ietf-w3c@w3.org" <public-ietf-w3c@w3.org>, Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org>, Philippe Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>, Daniel Appelquist <appelquist@gmail.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Mark's advice is to pursue getting W3C liaisons to IETF to make a Liaison Statement, to which the IETF will reply, rather than trying to get IETF consensus on draft-ruby-url-problem. * What is the process of getting W3C to make such a statement? what would it say? * What next? What's our goal, how will we get there, and what is the path to success? Could the liaison statement reference draft-ruby-url-problem for details, and basically ask "please work with to develop and execute a plan"? Now we've made a concrete proposal. Larry -- http://larry.masinter.net
Received on Sunday, 21 December 2014 19:06:18 UTC