RE: [url] Requests for Feedback (was Feedback from TPAC)

Mark, as you know, consensus is built one person at a time.
Do you agree with this document's "Problem Statement",
that it identifies an important problem. If not, why not?

If so, do you believe that the Proposed Solution is the
best course forward to pursue, and likely to succeed?
Do you think the problem unsolvable, or do you have
ideas for better solutions.

You, Mark. And others on the list of course. 

Thanks,
Larry


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Nottingham [mailto:mnot@mnot.net]
> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 3:36 PM
> To: Sam Ruby
> Cc: public-ietf-w3c@w3.org; Wendy Seltzer; Philippe Le Hégaret
> Subject: Re: [url] Requests for Feedback (was Feedback from TPAC)
> 
> Hey Sam,
> 
> > On 18 Dec 2014, at 10:34 pm, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:
> [...]
> > I'm still looking for advice on how to get this approved as Informational plus
> IETF Consensus.
> 
> Did you see <http://www.w3.org/mid/EBA7F2BE-DCC7-4BD2-AEAC-
> 92790C30A92D@mnot.net>? I think that contains the starting points you need;
> if you need more information, glad to help. Again I urge you to coordinate with
> Wendy and Philippe (CC:ed).
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> 
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>

Received on Friday, 19 December 2014 01:47:38 UTC