- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 07:46:46 +1000
- To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Cc: Philippe Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org>, "superuser@gmail.com" <superuser@gmail.com>, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org>, public-ietf-w3c <public-ietf-w3c@w3.org>
On 20 Aug 2014, at 3:25 am, Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org> wrote: >> I emailed Eric (and others) about this in June, but didn't get a response until 17 July, by which time it was too late, so I suggested the Honolulu meeting (but still in httpbis). >> >> Eric is free to bring it up on the WG mailing list in the meantime, of course. > > I got a couple of private emails discussing the impact on caches, but nothing on-list. Should I poke the list somehow, and if so, is there a protocol to say "pay attention to me!”? Eric, you’ve never brought it up on the mailing list — that would be a good start! >> It's getting hard to escape the feeling that people expect that the HTTP WG is going to rubber-stamp this proposal; I wouldn't make that assumption, and (once again) encourage its proponents to bring it up on the WG mailing list. > > I understand the concearn, but I think the TAG and the LDP WG are anxious to engage the community about this. I'd like to get some idea of the right forum so I can guage interest and issues. httpbis. -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Tuesday, 19 August 2014 21:47:18 UTC