- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 09:21:49 +1000
- To: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
- Cc: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>, "michel@suignard.com" <michel@suignard.com>, "tony@att.com" <tony@att.com>, "plh@w3.org" <plh@w3.org>, "adil@diwan.com" <adil@diwan.com>, "robin@berjon.com" <robin@berjon.com>, "ted.ietf@gmail.com" <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, "John O'Conner" <jooconne@adobe.com>, "presnick@qualcomm.com" <presnick@qualcomm.com>, "chris@lookout.net" <chris@lookout.net>, "public-ietf-w3c@w3.org" <public-ietf-w3c@w3.org>
On 17/09/2012, at 6:55 AM, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com> wrote: >> I don't really know enough to be against it myself but >> it does sound like a bad security idea from the mails I've >> seen pass by so count me amongst those concerned about >> this. > > I'd caution you about forming an opinion after having heard only one > side of the issue. So, let's hear the other side; we're listening. As Chris said a few days ago, it'd be helpful to see an end-to-end use case, to give some context. -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Sunday, 16 September 2012 23:22:28 UTC