- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 09:51:06 +0200
- To: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- CC: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, public-ietf-w3c@w3.org
On 2012-08-22 10:33, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2012-08-01 19:33, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote: >> Following the morning discussion, here are the links to the web+ >> definition: >> >> http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/system-state-and-capabilities.html#custom-handlers >> >> look for the item on scheme (registerProtocolHandler() only) >> >> http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/iana.html#web-scheme-prefix >> Note that the Working Group is about to decide that this section needs >> rewrite because it must not look like an IANA registration. >> >> I also suggest to look at the rational section of a change proposal >> related to this: >> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/User:Eoconnor/ISSUE-189#Rationale >> >> Philippe > > Two observations: > > a) in the meantime, the HTML WG chairs have decided to reject my CP and > to keep "web+" in the spec (see > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Aug/0115.html>) > > b) all feedback I've seen over here seems to come from people either > active in the IETF, or both IETF and W3C; what are the next steps to > actually make progress now? > > Best regards, Julian We aren't making progress. How do we fix this? Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 6 September 2012 07:51:41 UTC