Re: web+: enabling websites to expose services with custom URI schemes to registerProtocolHandler.

On 2012-08-22 10:33, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2012-08-01 19:33, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:
>> Following the morning discussion, here are the links to the web+
>> definition:
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/system-state-and-capabilities.html#custom-handlers
>>
>>    look for the item on scheme (registerProtocolHandler() only)
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/iana.html#web-scheme-prefix
>>    Note that the Working Group is about to decide that this section needs
>> rewrite because it must not look like an IANA registration.
>>
>> I also suggest to look at the rational section of a change proposal
>> related to this:
>>   http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/User:Eoconnor/ISSUE-189#Rationale
>>
>> Philippe
>
> Two observations:
>
> a) in the meantime, the HTML WG chairs have decided to reject my CP and
> to keep "web+" in the spec (see
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Aug/0115.html>)
>
> b) all feedback I've seen over here seems to come from people either
> active in the IETF, or both IETF and W3C; what are the next steps to
> actually make progress now?
>
> Best regards, Julian

We aren't making progress. How do we fix this?

Best regards, Julian