- From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
- Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 11:24:39 -0600
- To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
- CC: "julian.reschke@gmx.de" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "public-ietf-w3c@w3.org" <public-ietf-w3c@w3.org>, Edward O'Connor <eoconnor@apple.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 8/23/12 11:06 AM, Larry Masinter wrote: > Maybe ask IETF websec and/or W3C webappsec to review it, if the > purpose and meaning of the "web+" prefix is a security property? I think having the W3C WebAppSec WG look into the security aspects makes some sense, and might be better received than yet more feedback from "those IETF people". (Yes, we're all the same people, but folks don't always look at it that way.) Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAlA2Z1cACgkQNL8k5A2w/vzrzQCg2+98NvxY43iuB6+OndetNRja TXMAoKGpbSqMzJuqjy0lswBoAE8eQXz8 =sWXm -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 23 August 2012 17:25:07 UTC