- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 14:24:20 +0200
- To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
- CC: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, public-ietf-w3c@w3.org, Edward O'Connor <eoconnor@apple.com>
On 2012-08-01 20:37, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > ... For the record: I agree with what Peter said. In addition I'd like to remind everyone that overloading parts of the name this way can only be done once (there's only one prefix), and thus affects all future URI scheme names. So *if* we did something like this, it really should be done by the body responsible for scheme names (and that's the difference to that +xml media type suffix Maciej mentioned over on the HTML WG mailing list: it *was* introduced in an IETF spec). Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 16 August 2012 12:24:51 UTC