- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 16:35:16 -0400
- To: ext Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, public-webapps@w3.org
- CC: public-ietf-w3c@w3.org, Salvatore Loreto <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com>, Gabriel Montenegro <Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Hi All - I see that Hixie already submitted comments and I encourage others, especially those that have participated in the implementation of the Web Sockets API, to also submit comments. All comments should be submitted to hybi@ietf.org by April 15 at the latest. If anyone in WebApps wants to propose an official WG response, please do so ASAP, in reply to this email so the WebApps WG can discuss it. Thomas - for those of us not familiar with IETF process: * If their Last Call process differs from the W3C's LC process, please explain the diff(s) * Does the IETF have a Candidate Recommendation publication and process like the W3C? In particular, will the IETF create a test suite and mandate two or implementations pass the test suite before they consider the protocol spec "done"? Also, when - approximately - does the IETF plan to publish a LC of the Web Socket Protocol? -Art Barstow On Mar/29/2011 7:58 AM, ext Thomas Roessler wrote: > The websockets protocol is getting to a point where it's not quite in Last Call yet, but could use review from an API perspective: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-06 > > I'm copying the chairs of the IETF hybi WG (Gabriel Montenegro and Salvatore Loreto), and Mark Nottingham (IETF liaison to the W3C). > > Regards, > -- > Thomas Roessler, W3C<tlr@w3.org> (@roessler) > > > > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 29 March 2011 20:37:26 UTC