- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 11:16:21 +1100
- To: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: public-ietf-w3c <public-ietf-w3c@w3.org>
Fair enough, and I'm not set on changing it. Just worth a discussion, I think. Richard's proposal was interesting, though; I think an "XHR-Dirty" header would meet your requirements, although it needs the server to enforce policy for new (non-enumerated) headers. Cheers, On 22/02/2011, at 11:05 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 09:32:07 +0100, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote: >> For the record, this has been in XMLHttpRequest for a long time (February 2008) and has been through multiple Last Calls for which the HTTP WG has been notified. This is not a new Level 2 feature. > > I should probably add that just like Adam Barth I do not mind changing the design. Apart from the WebSocket protocol I do not believe it has been used thus far. > > > -- > Anne van Kesteren > http://annevankesteren.nl/ -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Wednesday, 23 February 2011 00:16:53 UTC