- From: Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler) <RogerCutler@chevrontexaco.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 13:10:41 -0600
- To: public-ietf-w3c@w3.org
- Message-ID: <71C38086EA230D43941DD0A3BAFF8CA9059581@bocnte2k3.hou150.chevrontexaco.net>
ChevronTexaco spends a lot of money trying to cope with spam coming into our mail server. In addition we view spam as a threat to the entire Web. And we are individually and personally affected by spam -- that is, it really makes us grumpy. All these factors mean that we feel we are stakeholders in the spam problem. Recently efforts like SPF and Sender ID seem to show some promise for helping the situation. We have implemented both in an experimental mode but we are still evaluating how effective these techniques might be for us in production. The effectiveness of both seem to depend on whether the techniques are widely accepted. We would not mind at the least getting some guidance on this from groups like the W3C and IETF. Moreover, we need products from vendors that will help with the problem, and it seems to us vendors are not going to build anything unless the landscape is fairly clear -- we need standards and consensus on those standards so that we can expect to purchase products that build to those standards. We probably need a few such standards that are more or less endorsed or understood to be effective, not twenty or thirty that result in a morass of confusion. We view this as a serious problem and we would like to see organizations like the W3C and IETF helping with it. We are less interested in whose turf it is than that the issues get addressed.
Received on Wednesday, 26 January 2005 22:12:30 UTC