- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 19:12:35 +0900
- To: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>, public-ietf-collation@w3.org
- Cc: Philip Guenther <guenther+collation@sendmail.com>
At 17:34 05/09/22, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote: >We decided to adopt the draft as a WG draft, even though it's not strictly speaking an IMAP matter. As a WG draft, it's within the domain of a chair who's good at pushing people into doing reviews and good at shepherding a draft to RFC. I think this is great! This is the best way to get the draft finally moving on at greater speed. I happen to know the chair, and I agree with your description of her abilities. On the other hand, I'm somewhat worried that the we may end up with a draft that's perfect for IMAP, but doesn't work for other protocols/formats/languages. Therefore, please make sure that all discussion is (cross)posted to the public-ietf-collation@w3.org list. This at least gives people from other venues a chance to comment; if they miss that chance, then that's their fault. Regards, Martin.
Received on Thursday, 22 September 2005 10:37:15 UTC