Re: comments on draft-newman-i18n-comparator-05.txt

At 17:34 05/09/22, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:

 >We decided to adopt the draft as a WG draft, even though it's not 
strictly speaking an IMAP matter. As a WG draft, it's within the domain of 
a chair who's good at pushing people into doing reviews and good at 
shepherding a draft to RFC.

I think this is great! This is the best way to get the draft
finally moving on at greater speed. I happen to know the chair,
and I agree with your description of her abilities.

On the other hand, I'm somewhat worried that the we may end up
with a draft that's perfect for IMAP, but doesn't work for other
protocols/formats/languages. Therefore, please make sure that
all discussion is (cross)posted to the public-ietf-collation@w3.org
list. This at least gives people from other venues a chance to
comment; if they miss that chance, then that's their fault.

Regards,    Martin.

Received on Thursday, 22 September 2005 10:37:15 UTC