- From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:52:17 +0100
- To: public-identity@w3.org
On 01/26/2012 02:11 AM, Mitch Zollinger wrote: > In designing the technology that satisfies the use case doc posted > previously (http://www.w3.org/wiki/NetflixWebCryptoUseCase) it would > appear that we need to support compression / decompression APIs. > > The reason is that for our "MsgSec" protocol, we encrypt every message > going over the wire and since encrypted data cannot be compressed, the > compression has to happen before encryption. Therefore standard things > like HTTP gzip compression will not work. > > What we're looking for is something along the lines of: > > function compress(data, algorithm) > function uncompress(data, algorithm) > > where algorithm is one of the standard ones (gzip, bzip2, etc.) > So, I think while I could see this being outside the scope of the WG, I would be OK with it being part of the scope of the WG if we don't get feature-bloat. So, is there anything *beyond* a simple compress/uncompress that is needed? Note that there is some experience (albeit in a separate field, W3C Widgets/Google Gadgets/etc. of even simple gzip being surprisingly difficult to standardize. However, since there are crypto ramifications to compression, I'm game for it being in scope. How many people *want* this? Any objections? > Is this the right forum for looking at this type of functionality? > > Mitch > >
Received on Monday, 30 January 2012 10:51:48 UTC