- From: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren@telia.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 16:24:16 +0200
- To: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
- CC: "public-identity@w3.org" <public-identity@w3.org>
Hi Hannes, I know that nobody wants to hear the truth but the fact is that the big three doesn't need a committee to bring out new identity solutions. They can do that in their own eco-systems. It is also *forbidden* to speak openly about requirements if you work for a vendor like Apple or Microsoft. Google haven't described anything about their wallet and the chip is under NDA. Given these conditions, I don't see how we could succeed. Regarding my project, I just want to put it out :-) The controversy with Open Security Hardware makes it it an unreachable topic for an SDO. Anders On 2011-10-25 15:19, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: > Hi Anders, > > From your history I know that you have been working on key provisioning mechanisms. > > I guess you are envisioning to use the JavaCrypto API as a way to provision keys into a local key storage. > (or something like that) > > I would like to get a better understanding of what you read in the charter. > > Ciao > Hannes > > > On Oct 25, 2011, at 3:44 PM, Anders Rundgren wrote: > >> I don't see that a few obscure "independents" like me, and three giant *arch-enemy* >> vendors would ever come up with something useful in this space. >> >> If W3C is serious about this they *MUST* find an active, large *user* party like the >> US government or a large US bank. >> >> Anders >> > > >
Received on Tuesday, 25 October 2011 14:25:02 UTC