- From: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren@telia.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 15:02:29 +0100
- To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>
- CC: "public-identity@w3.org" <public-identity@w3.org>
Harry, Good initiative! I would be happy to get an encryption use-case. So far message-based encryption hasn't been a huge success. Anders On 2011-11-24 14:55, Harry Halpin wrote: > If you look at our current charter, then you'll see that there is > currently no goals section, only a brief paragraph. I'd like to get the > goals section more concrete, and use that as an exercise in scoping the > charter down. Right now, we have more features than use-cases, and I > want to clearly connect every feature to a use-case. > > So before AC Review, I'd like to have an explicit goals section that > lists in one or two terse sentences each of the use-cases that people on > the list find important. > > So everyone who has a use-case please send it now, described in 1-2 > sentences. Then also, *look* at the primary/secondary/ and out-of-scope > features and list what features are necessary for the goal. Also, to see > if anything is missing. > > I've heard the following: > > 1) To determine if device is suitable for certain content > 2) Loading keys from a USB/smartcard for financial transactions ("Korean > bank" use-case) > 3) Identity claims signing > 4) JS Code-signing > 5) Helping OAuth > > I'm sure there are more. Having a use-case at this stage does not mean > it will be covered by API, as that will require actually specing the > case out in a use-cases and requirement document and getting consensus > from WG (including implementors). > > cheers, > harry > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 24 November 2011 14:03:08 UTC