- From: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren@telia.com>
- Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 03:51:13 +0100
- To: "public-identity@w3.org" <public-identity@w3.org>
The following is related to DOMCrypt and similar... http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4627 Having a strong background in XML schema authoring I'm slightly puzzled by the enthusiasm of using "secure" objects that (seem) to have no notion of explicit (built-in) name-spaces or a description language. Lets say that you have a system that accepts a certain set of different objects. How can you tell the difference between them without writing some kind of "content sniffer"? How can you deal with JSON objects in Java? It seems that you only get an "Object" and then have to explicitly cast that based on knowledge of the data structure. If I were into the JOSE stuff, I would consider adding a mandatory name-space to all container objects which would open the door to automatic generation of proxy objects and data validation. There's no imminent need to agree on a JSON DL at this stage. Anders
Received on Tuesday, 6 December 2011 02:51:55 UTC