- From: Madlaina Kalunder <madlaina.kalunder@gmx.ch>
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 21:01:14 +0100
- To: public-idcg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <554316ea-7006-966e-57c6-6fa6e95eb0bc@gmx.ch>
0 I agree with Florian, not heavily opposing but I do believe better to leave it to a small team. On 20/02/2019 02:50, Florian Rivoal wrote: > 0 > > I don't oppose strictly, but I am slightly reluctant for the reasons > mentioned in > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-idcg/2019Feb/0072.html and > would likely prefer leaving it up to the W3C team run. > > —Florian > >> On Feb 20, 2019, at 4:38, Rhian Jones >> <rhian.jones@digital.cabinet-office.gov.uk >> <mailto:rhian.jones@digital.cabinet-office.gov.uk>> wrote: >> >> +1 to offer support as needed. >> Rhian >> >> On Tue, 19 Feb 2019, 18:46 Léonie Watson <lw@tetralogical.com >> <mailto:lw@tetralogical.com> wrote: >> >> Everyone, >> >> The proposal is that the diversity fund selection committee should >> consist of: >> >> * One person from each sponsor organisation >> * Two people from W3C team >> * Two people from this CG >> >> If you support this proposal, please reply to this email with +1 >> at the top.. >> >> If you do not support this proposal, please reply to this email >> with -1 >> at the top. >> >> If you don't feel strongly about it, please reply to this email >> with 0 >> at the top. >> >> If you prefer to reply privately, please send me an email and let me >> know your response. >> >> Please respond by the end of your day on Friday 22nd February. >> Thank you. >> -- >> Director @TetraLogical >> >
Received on Wednesday, 20 February 2019 20:01:42 UTC