- From: Rachel Comerford <rachel.comerford@macmillan.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 10:40:31 -0500
- To: lw@tetralogical.com
- Cc: "public-idcg@w3.org" <public-idcg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAESEvMzPXUv7bet-J-N2+VjEeVLYKXG=Su+y6w6ALodBa=Xs_Q@mail.gmail.com>
+1 Rachel Comerford | Senior Director of Content Standards and Accessibility | T 212.576.9433 *Macmillan Learning* On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 12:10 PM Léonie Watson <lw@tetralogical.com> wrote: > Everyone, > > This is the second of the three proposals we need to make a decision about. > > Proposal 2: > Adopt the following description of the Diversity Scholarship. > > Note: the description uses "scholarship" throughout. If the CG decides > to change it to "fund", it will mean minor editorial changes to the > following text. > > > The purpose of the W3C diversity scholarship is to increase > participation at TPAC, by people who could otherwise not attend. > > To apply to the diversity scholarship you should be from a group that is > under-represented in the web community, and unable to attend TPAC > without financial help. > > When you apply, you will be asked to explain (in one or two sentences) > what perspectives you will bring, and which areas you would like to > contribute to during TPAC. You are not required to self-identify as > belonging to any particular group, but If you are comfortable sharing > that information it will help us ensure the scholarships are balanced > across different under-represented groups. > > The definition of "under-represented" means different things to > different people, and the language used is also different depending on > where you are. For this reason we've chosen not to name specific > under-represented groups in this information. > > If you are thinking of applying to the diversity scholarship, but you > are not sure whether you should, please get in touch. We will answer > your questions in confidence, and can offer any help you might need to > complete the application. > > * If you support this proposal, please reply to this email with a +1 at > the top. > * If you do not support this proposal, please reply to this email with a > -1 at the top. > * If you do not feel strongly about this proposal, or do not want to > participate, please reply to this email with a 0 at the top. > > You do not have to respond at all, but it really helps if you do. If you > would prefer to respond privately, you can send your response to me > directly (to lw@tetralogical.com). > > Please respond before the end of the day on Friday 8th February 2019. > > Thank you. > > Léonie. > > -- > Director TetraLogical > >
Received on Friday, 8 February 2019 15:41:05 UTC