Re: WSDL 2.0 review?

Dear Jonathan,

Thanks for the info, and again soory for being late. We will comment in a  
hopefully useful and - as for the timing - appropriate way.

Best regards,

Felix

On Thu, 22 Sep 2005 00:46:56 +0900, Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>  
wrote:

>
> Given the number and moderate scale of last call comments that came in I  
> expect to have almost all the comments we've received processed at our  
> face-to-face next week.  If that holds true, we might be able to go to  
> CR before October ends.  So if you have partial comments ready before  
> Oct 10th please send them our way!
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Felix Sasaki [mailto:fsasaki@w3.org]
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 7:08 AM
>> To: Jonathan Marsh; public-i18n-ws@w3.org; w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org
>> Subject: Re: WSDL 2.0 review?
>>
>> Dear John,
>>
>> Sorry for being late with my reply. The I18N Core wg would like to
>> make
>> comments, and it would be great to give the comments three weeks after
>> 19
>> September. I hope that this is fine with you.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Felix
>>
>> On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 08:29:03 +0900, Jonathan Marsh
>> <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > Dear I18N WG,
>> >
>> > The WSDL 2.0 Last Call ends on 19th Sept.  We incorporated
>> resolutions
>> > to all your previous comments, but another look would be beneficial
>> to
>> > ensure that we dealt with them correctly and that no new issues have
>> > arisen.
>> >
>> > Despite your useful review of our first Last Call I neglected to
>> list
>> > you explicitly in the call for reviews below, for which I apologize.
>> Do
>> > you plan to conduct another review of our documents?  If yes, how
>> much
>> > more time would such a review require?
>> >
>> > Jonathan Marsh
>> > WS Description WG
>> >
>> > --------------------------------------------
>> > From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
>> > Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 09:35:02 -0700
>> > Message-ID:
>> > <7DA77BF2392448449D094BCEF67569A5087534F2@RED-MSG-
>> 30.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
>> > To: <chairs@w3.org>
>> > Cc: "W3C Group" <w3c-ws-cg@w3.org>
>> >
>> > Earlier today, four Last Call documents from the Web Services
>> > Description were been published on http://www.w3.org/TR/.
>> >
>> > - Web Services Description Language (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 1:
>> >   Core Language
>> >     http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-wsdl20-20050803
>> >
>> >  - Web Services Description Language (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 2:
>> >   Adjuncts
>> >     http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-wsdl20-adjuncts-20050803
>> >
>> > - Web Services Description Language (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 0:
>> >   Primer
>> >     http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-wsdl20-primer-20050803
>> >
>> > - Web Services Description Language (WSDL) Version 2.0 SOAP 1.1
>> Binding
>> >     http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-wsdl20-soap11-binding-20050803
>> >
>> > For the Core and Adjuncts specs, this is the second Last Call,
>> > representing the incorporation of significant changes due to over
>> 200 LC
>> > comments.  For the Primer and SOAP 1.1 Binding, this represents the
>> > first Last Call.  We intend to synchronize the publication dates and
>> > status of these documents from now on.
>> >
>> > The Last Call period ends 19 Sep 2005.  Our intention is to hold
>> closely
>> > to the date in order to move these specs into CR promptly.  The Web
>> > Services Coordination Group agreed with these dates.  Reviewers
>> unable
>> > to provide feedback on these documents by the 19th should contact
>> us.
>> >
>> > We would specifically like to receive reviews from the following
>> WGs:
>> >
>> >   XML Protocol WG
>> >   XML Schema WG
>> >   Web Services Choreography
>> >   Web Services Addressing
>> >
>> > Jonathan Marsh
>> > WS Description WG
>> >
>> > --  Jonathan
>> > Marsh  --  jmarsh@microsoft.com  --
>> http://spaces.msn.com/members/auburnmarshes/  --
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 21 September 2005 16:11:48 UTC