Issue 502 is closed

On Thu, 2 Sep 2004, A. Vine wrote:

[issue 502 [1] covers the points 5 and 6 of your email [2]. ]

The XMLP WG decided to close issue 502 with the following resolution:

point 5:
The following text was added to section 4.2.2:
<<<
The value of the resource attribute information SHOULD be a URI Reference 
as defined in RFC 2396 including ammendments to that definition found in 
RFC 2732.
>>>

point 6:
The following text was added in section 4.1:
<<<
URIs that are character for character identical MUST be considered equal 
when using a representation header to resolve a web reference; URIs that 
are considered equal according to the URI scheme of the URI SHOULD be 
considered equal.
>>>
Please note that the use of the Representation header does NOT mandate 
that its content is the authoritative representation of the resource. Nor 
what an application must do with it.

Please let the Working Group know if that resolution is acceptable or not
as soon as possible.
Regards,

[1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-cr-issues.html#x502
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlp-comments/2004Sep/0000.html

-- 
Yves Lafon - W3C
"Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras."