RE: [WSTF] Teleconference Reminder... today

The keyword in the sentence below is "informally" as there is no coordinated activity planned. 

Several members have expressed that they are too busy to have a formal meeting. We rejected the idea of a face-to-face due to  low participation numbers by members (of the regular members, Tex, Mike, Martin, and myself are present; Kentaroh, Takao, and Deb are absent). 

I would be very happy to coordinate a meeting or roundtable during the IUC.

I am free on Monday as well. I believe Tex (at least) has a tutorial? I arrive late Saturday (22 Mar) and am in Prague through until 30 Mar, so I have time available, and I'm staying at the Marriott.

Thanks,

Addison

Addison P. Phillips
Director, Globalization Architecture
webMethods, Inc.

+1 408.962.5487 (phone)  +1 408.210.3569 (mobile)
-------------------------------------------------
Internationalization is an architecture.
It is not a feature. 

Chair, W3C-I18N-WG Web Services Task Force
To participate see http://www.w3.org/International/ws 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Davis [mailto:mark.davis@jtcsv.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 4:43 PM
> To: Addison Phillips [wM]; public-i18n-ws@w3.org
> Subject: Re: [WSTF] Teleconference Reminder... today
> 
> 
> When will we be meeting in Prague? Is there a single contact 
> person that we
> can all coordinate with once we arrive? I will be open all of Monday.
> 
> Mark
> ________
> mark.davis@jtcsv.com
> IBM, MS 50-2/B11, 5600 Cottle Rd, SJ CA 95193
> (408) 256-3148
> fax: (408) 256-0799
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Addison Phillips [wM]" <aphillips@webmethods.com>
> To: "Addison Phillips [wM]" <aphillips@webmethods.com>;
> <public-i18n-ws@w3.org>
> Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 16:25
> Subject: RE: [WSTF] Teleconference Reminder... today
> 
> 
> >
> > attendees: martin, tex, deb, addison (chair, scribe)
> >
> > Next Meeting: RESCHEDULED for next Tueday, 18 March, at the usual time.
> >
> > Following Meeting: Need to consider how daylight time affects 
> the meeting
> schedule (a time change may be necessary to include Kentaroh). 
> Meeting on 25
> March will be canceled due to IUC participation of most of team. 
> Many of us
> may meet informally in Prague.
> >
> > 1. Action Items review:
> >
> > >  -Mike/Deb: Work on complex transaction Usage Scenarios [Not
> > > started. Deb to call on Mike]
> > >  -Tex: to look at WSDL for further usage scenarios [to do]
> > >  -AP: will add link to membership on main page [to do]
> > >  -AP: Send integration patterns whitepaper link. [to do]
> > >  -AP: Check ULocale paper link. [to do]
> > >  -AP: Send "patterns" usage scenarios
> > >  -MD/AP: Send Deb Mike's email [DONE]
> >
> > 2. Discussion.
> >
> > Deb) A large email document coming containing review of WS-Arch Usage
> Scenarios. Deb suggested that we consider it and comment. In addition, the
> editorial information in our Usage Scenarios should be aligned with this
> (and other Use Case) documentation. Discussion of other Web 
> Service Scenario
> doc structures.
> >
> > Martin) For future reference, can send large HTML attachment 
> via the list.
> >
> > Deb) WSArch UC doc is very valuable. Maybe base ours on it too.
> >
> > Deb) WS-Arch Connectionless case is unclear. We need some 
> diagrams in our
> usage scenarios.
> >
> > Addison) Scenario categorization? We should consider 
> reformulating our US
> documtne to make it easier to use, by tying it to WS-Arch and others?
> >
> > Addison) Do a new call for participation? Should we call for specific
> technologies...? Do we need to set a deadline?
> >
> > ACTION) Review of Deb's comments for inclusion.
> > ACTION) Team to discuss reviewing Usage Scenarios and reenergizing
> activity at next meeting (pre-IUC).
> >
> > 3. IUC Activities and our participation on the W3C Panel.
> >
> > Tex) We should consider handing out the WSUS document @ the IUC? It's a
> good reference and might be a useful discussion piece. Perhaps an 
> extract...
> > Martin) Extracts governed by W3C.
> > ACTION) Addison to investigate getting printouts. Tex and 
> Addison to look
> at chunking or summarizing as necessary.
> >
> >
> > Tex) Next IUC is in Atlanta in October-ish... Tex to check timeframe.
> >
> > Deb) Raise issue about faults. SOAP 1.2 faults hopeless. 
> hardcoded string.
> can't be nested (hierarchical cf. stacktrace).
> > Deb) lang nego mechanism entirely lacking. Needed for localizing faults.
> (also localizing services).
> > Tex) Need to instill or provoke a sense of urgency in panel audience.
> convey the interesting issues. raise issues and motivate folks to getting
> involved. spur recruitment. get a justification for action.
> > Martin) Will talk to Richard about activities etc.
> > Martin) Sending link to paper about localization presentation to list.
> > Martin) encodings in IETF as a general issue.
> > Tex) We need to be "disturbing" or get juice flowing comments...
> > Tex) maybe not ask for actual scenarios, but get requirements in
> advance...
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

Received on Friday, 14 March 2003 20:24:27 UTC