- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 14:14:34 -0400
- To: "Addison Phillips [wM]" <aphillips@webmethods.com>, <public-i18n-ws@w3.org>
These are my very simplified notes of last week's WS I18N TF teleconference: Present: Deb, Tex, Martin (scribe/chair) At 13:35 03/06/26 -0700, Addison Phillips [wM] wrote: >W3C-I18N-WG Web Services TF teleconference [WSTF] >----------------------------------------------------------------------------- >Bridge : +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim) with conference code 4186 (spells "I18N") >Duration : 60 minutes >----------------------------------------------------------------------------- >Day : Tuesday >Dates : 1 July 2003 >Start : 23:00 GMT, 18:00 Eastern, 15:00 Pacific, 07:00 Tokyo (next day!) >----------------------------------------------------------------------------- >Zakim information : http://www.w3.org/2002/01/UsingZakim >Zakim bridge monitor : http://www.w3.org/1998/12/bridge/Zakim.html >Zakim IRC bot : http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot.html >----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >NOTE: I am sending the announcement a bit early because next week I'll be >on vacation for a week. Martin will host the telecon and keep notes. > >AGENDA >------ >1. Review Action Items Addison contributed one more review of Arch Scenarios S003 Tex asked which WSDL document to review now that there are 3. We recommended to start with http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl12/ Web Services Description Language (WSDL) Version 1.2 Part 1: Core Language The question was raised whether there would be a Primer. I checked with Philippe LeHegaret, staff contact of WSDL, and was told that there would be a primer at a later stage, when the design had stabilized more. >2. Discuss what the next step should be in getting the next revision of >the Usage Scenarios document created and released. Discussion about what data should be in context, what should be in profile, what should be metadata, and so on. May be depending on application, but useful to have general guidelines. Deb: from discussion with WS 'big guys', got feeling that we need good use cases to make anything/anybody move Martin: Usage scenario document is a bit more open ended than a spec. Deb: Our usage scenarios document is still somewhat unfinished compared with similar documents. Some discussion about how to move forward within current charter; duration of group is for two years, but milestones are only set for one year. Some discussion about a potential next face-to-face, not conclusive. Regards, Martin. >3. Discuss on-going review process of WS-Architecture Usage Scenarios. >4. Discuss review of WSDL 1.2 to ensure timely feedback on any issues. >5. Other business > >ACTION ITEMS >------------ >- Tex: Post early WSDL review comments. >- Deb/Mike: Post rough WS-Choreography notes. >- All: Please review and contribute additional Scenarios > (some progress: where are YOURS?) >- All: Please sign up for your 3-4 WS-Architecture scenarios > > >Addison P. Phillips >Director, Globalization Architecture >webMethods, Inc. > >+1 408.962.5487 (phone) +1 408.210.3569 (mobile) >------------------------------------------------- >Internationalization is an architecture. >It is not a feature. > >Chair, W3C-I18N-WG Web Services Task Force >To participate see http://www.w3.org/International/ws
Received on Friday, 11 July 2003 14:39:30 UTC