- From: Badral S. <badral@bolorsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 13:03:16 +0100
- To: jrmt@almas.co.jp, 'siqin' <siqin@almas.co.jp>, 'Greg Eck' <greck@postone.net>, 'Erdenechimeg Myatav' <erdeely@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org
- Message-ID: <56978E84.9080606@bolorsoft.com>
Hi all, On 14.01.2016 03:44, jrmt@almas.co.jp wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > >Because NNBSP(202F) is word separator, > Siqin means here that NNBSP model defined the following characters are > all initial form as we discussed before. > I would name it as "Suffix joiner" to avoid the bitter problems, that we have experienced. Badral > > Just to correct his expression “word separator”, it is not mean word > breaker as we already have agreed in this discussion forum. > > Thanks and Best Regards, > > Jirimutu > > =============================================================== > > Almas Inc. > > 101-0021 601 Nitto-Bldg, 6-15-11, Soto-Kanda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo > > E-Mail: jrmt@almas.co.jp <mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp> Mobile : 090-6174-6115 > > Phone : 03-5688-2081, Fax : 03-5688-2082 > > http://www.almas.co.jp/ http://www.compiere-japan.com/ > > http://www.mongolfont.com/ > > =============================================================== > > *From:*siqin [mailto:siqin@almas.co.jp] > *Sent:* Thursday, January 14, 2016 11:30 AM > *To:* Greg Eck <greck@postone.net>; Erdenechimeg Myatav > <erdeely@gmail.com>; Jirimuto <jrmt@almas.co.jp>; Badral > (badral@bolorsoft.com) <badral@bolorsoft.com> > *Cc:* public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org > *Subject:* Re: New Proposal Status > > Hi Greg, > > Because NNBSP(202F) is word separator, > so i(1822,185E,1873),u(1824),ue(1826) as genetive word better to > define as Isolate form, not final form. > Same reason, i(1822,185E,1873),u(1824),ue(1826) in genetive words > iyan,iyen,un,ud,uen,ued better to have a Initial form like d(1833) and > y(1836). > > isolate_i_u_ue_and_initial_i_u_ue.png > > SiqinBilige. > > On 2016/01/14 2:22, Greg Eck wrote: > > Hi Erdenechimeg, Badral, Jirimutu, > > I have added back the argument for the FVS MisMatch. Please look > over for comment and typos. > > We can discuss the definition of the “FVS4” tomorrow. Issue at > stake is the need to specify a U+1887_FifthVariant which is not a > default positional glyph. > > Also U+180A as brought up by Jirimutu. > > Other issues … ? > > Thanks all for your good comments, > > Greg > -- Badral Sanlig, Software architect www.bolorsoft.com | www.badral.net Bolorsoft LLC, Selbe Khotkhon 40/4 D2, District 11, Ulaanbaatar
Received on Thursday, 14 January 2016 12:03:51 UTC