W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org > January to March 2016

Re: New Proposal Status

From: Badral S. <badral@bolorsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 13:03:16 +0100
To: jrmt@almas.co.jp, 'siqin' <siqin@almas.co.jp>, 'Greg Eck' <greck@postone.net>, 'Erdenechimeg Myatav' <erdeely@gmail.com>
Cc: public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org
Message-ID: <56978E84.9080606@bolorsoft.com>
Hi all,
On 14.01.2016 03:44, jrmt@almas.co.jp wrote:
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> >Because NNBSP(202F) is word separator,
> Siqin means here that NNBSP model defined the following characters are 
> all initial form as we discussed before.
>
I would name it as "Suffix joiner" to avoid the bitter problems, that we 
have experienced.

Badral
>
> Just to correct his expression “word separator”, it is not mean word 
> breaker as we already have agreed in this discussion forum.
>
> Thanks and Best Regards,
>
> Jirimutu
>
> ===============================================================
>
> Almas Inc.
>
> 101-0021 601 Nitto-Bldg, 6-15-11, Soto-Kanda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo
>
> E-Mail: jrmt@almas.co.jp <mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp> Mobile : 090-6174-6115
>
> Phone : 03-5688-2081,   Fax : 03-5688-2082
>
> http://www.almas.co.jp/ http://www.compiere-japan.com/
>
> http://www.mongolfont.com/
>
> ===============================================================
>
> *From:*siqin [mailto:siqin@almas.co.jp]
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 14, 2016 11:30 AM
> *To:* Greg Eck <greck@postone.net>; Erdenechimeg Myatav 
> <erdeely@gmail.com>; Jirimuto <jrmt@almas.co.jp>; Badral 
> (badral@bolorsoft.com) <badral@bolorsoft.com>
> *Cc:* public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org
> *Subject:* Re: New Proposal Status
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> Because NNBSP(202F) is word separator,
> so i(1822,185E,1873),u(1824),ue(1826) as genetive word better to 
> define as Isolate form, not final form.
> Same reason, i(1822,185E,1873),u(1824),ue(1826) in genetive words 
> iyan,iyen,un,ud,uen,ued better to have a Initial form like d(1833) and 
> y(1836).
>
>     isolate_i_u_ue_and_initial_i_u_ue.png
>
> SiqinBilige.
>
> On 2016/01/14 2:22, Greg Eck wrote:
>
>     Hi Erdenechimeg, Badral, Jirimutu,
>
>     I have added back the argument for the FVS MisMatch. Please look
>     over for comment and typos.
>
>     We can discuss the definition of the “FVS4” tomorrow. Issue at
>     stake is the need to specify a U+1887_FifthVariant which is not a
>     default positional glyph.
>
>     Also U+180A as brought up by Jirimutu.
>
>     Other issues … ?
>
>     Thanks all for your good comments,
>
>     Greg
>


-- 
Badral Sanlig, Software architect
www.bolorsoft.com | www.badral.net
Bolorsoft LLC, Selbe Khotkhon 40/4 D2, District 11, Ulaanbaatar
Received on Thursday, 14 January 2016 12:03:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:07:50 UTC