- From: Richard Wordingham <richard.wordingham@ntlworld.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 09:00:50 +0100
- To: "public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org" <public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org>
On Thu, 6 Aug 2015 06:57:20 +0000 Greg Eck <greck@postone.net> wrote: > Jirimutu, > > This is a very interesting discussion. > I am behind in my reading of the discussion, so forgive me if you > have already dealt with this. I am concerned with such a high figure > of 80% having multiple spelling possibilities. My dictionary+grammar > does not show this. He is saying that for over 80% of dictionary entries, that are at least two codepoint sequences that render the same. He is not counting 'unused/undefined' sequences using FVS. He further makes the point that people are often unsure which letter ought to be used in a particular place in a particular word. For example, with one exception, O and U are rendered the same, as are OE and UE. A and E are often indistinguishable in writing. In many contexts, O and OE are indistinguishable in writing. Richard.
Received on Thursday, 6 August 2015 08:01:25 UTC