- From: Greg Eck <greck@postone.net>
- Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 12:24:43 +0000
- To: Richard Wordingham <richard.wordingham@ntlworld.com>, "public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org" <public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org>
This should be cleared up with Andrew's comments re-stating that the set U+1880 - U+1884 are indeed phonetic sound markers - whether letter or mark and not punctuation. I will mark this for further discussion at a later date. Greg -----Original Message----- From: Richard Wordingham [mailto:richard.wordingham@ntlworld.com] Sent: Sunday, August 2, 2015 8:57 AM To: public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org Subject: Re: NNBSP Impact On Sun, 2 Aug 2015 08:55:25 +0900 <jrmt@almas.co.jp> wrote: > As my knowledge from ancient Mongolian linguistic expert , > > U1880 - U1884 is punctuation, not the part of Mongolian word. By which you mean, I presume, that they are not part of any Sanskrit or Vedic Sanskrit word when written in the Mongolian script, despite corresponding to marks that are parts of Sanskrit words in the Devanagari script. The U+1880 corresponds to U+0901 CANDRABINDU (also to U+0310 COMBINING CANDRABINDU used in the Latin script), <U+1880, U+180B> corresponds to U+0902 ANUSVARA, U+1881 to VISARGA, U+1882 to U+1CF5 JIHVAMULIYA, U+1883 and U+1884 to U+1CF6 UPADHMANIYA. Richard.
Received on Monday, 3 August 2015 12:25:36 UTC