Hi Andrew,
The case that Badral is referring to is a numeric digit followed by the ordinal suffixes DUGAR/DUEGER and DAQI/DEQI.
Specifically – a Latin digit OR a Mongolian digit followed by NNBSP followed by one of the four ordinal suffix forms DUGAR/DUEGER/DAQI/DEQI would be considered normal and the sequence should not be broken.
Here are two examples ...
<U+0031><U+202F><U+1833><U+1826><U+182D><U+1821><U+1837 >
<U+0032><U+202F><U+1833><U+1824><U+182D><U+1820><U+1837 >
Badral, please confirm.
Greg
PS I am attaching a DS05 dealing with all known usages of the NNBSP in Mongolian. The file includes both text strings as well as images. The ordinal section is on page 4.
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew West [mailto:andrewcwest@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 1, 2015 4:12 AM
To: Badral S. <badral@bolorsoft.com>
Cc: public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org
Subject: Re: Mongolian NNBSP [I18N-ACTION-458]
On 31 July 2015 at 19:50, Badral S. <badral@bolorsoft.com<mailto:badral@bolorsoft.com>> wrote:
>
>>> What is the context for "Numeric NNBSP Aletter" ? ExtendNumLet would
>>> inhibit a word break after a numeric, but I think that MidLetter
>>> would not.
>
> Then MidLetter is correct. A word break after a numeric is incorrect.
I still do not know what the context for this use case is. Is it normal to have "Numeric NNBSP ALetter"? Can you provide an example?
Andrew
