- From: Badral S. <badral@bolorsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 16:58:38 +0200
- To: public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org
On 31.07.2015 13:46, Richard Wordingham wrote: > On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 09:23:51 +0100 > Andrew West <andrewcwest@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 31 July 2015 at 08:57, Richard Wordingham >> <richard.wordingham@ntlworld.com> wrote: >>> On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 08:19:15 +0100 >>> Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org> wrote: >>> >>>>> 1. Consensus to change the wordbreak property of U+202F to >>>>> ExtendNumLet and sentence break of U+202F to Other >>> Why on earth ExtendNumLet and not MidLetter or MidNumLet? >> There is a word break between MidLetter or MidNumLet and ALetter >> (which Mongolian letters are), whereas there is no word break between >> ExtendNumLet and ALetter. >> >> http://www.unicode.org/Public/8.0.0/ucd/auxiliary/WordBreakTest.html > This would be horribly faulty logic, but it may be the reasoning that > was applied. > > So far as I am aware, Mongolian words do not start with NNBSP. Correct. > The relevant sequence is Aletter NNBSP Aletter, for which see > Examples 6 to 9 in the referenced link. The first example is the > *three* characters "c.d", in which by the rules there is no word break. Not entirely correct. The possible sequences are: Aletter NNBSP Aletter, FVS1 NNBSP Aletter, FVS2 NNBSP Aletter, FVS3 NNBSP Aletter, Numeric NNBSP Aletter, ... Badral -- Badral Sanlig, Software architect www.bolorsoft.com | www.badral.net Bolorsoft LLC, Selbe Khotkhon 40/4 D2, District 11, Ulaanbaatar
Received on Friday, 31 July 2015 14:59:12 UTC