Re: Fwd: Re: I18N-ACTION-1157: Create jlreq-d repo

   hi Richard,

   Thank you for comments, and sorry for late catch-up.

   I'm talking with Kida-san for pointed items, also we have an issue as:
https://github.com/w3c/jlreq-d/issues/1


   I really agree that we should have "(TBD)" or something, but still wondering what we
could put into README, like title itself is still TBD. Kida-san is seeking existing
items (e.g. some note in /docs/ or issue, in jlreq repository; or email archive), but
not yet reached to a position to insert something...
   And, yes of course, we'll add a link to this new repository into jlreq README shortly.

On 2022/06/06 23:47, r12a wrote:
> 
> Sorry, sent this to the wrong list.
> ri
> 
> 
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject:  Re: I18N-ACTION-1157: Create jlreq-d repo
> Resent-Date:  Mon, 06 Jun 2022 14:46:18 +0000
> Resent-From:  public-i18n-core@w3.org
> Date:  Mon, 6 Jun 2022 15:46:12 +0100
> From:  r12a <ishida@w3.org>
> To:  Atsushi Shimono (W3C Team) <atsushi@w3.org>
> CC:  public-i18n-core@w3.org
> 
> 
> 
> hi Atsushi,
> 
> Thanks for doing that.
> 
> I think it would be better to have a sentence appear when someone tries to open https://w3c.github.io/jlreq-d/, saying something like "This page has yet to be developed".  Also, a note in parens after the link in the readme saying "(TBD)" might be useful.  Otherwise, it's not immediately obvious to people that they are not experiencing an error when they try to see the page.
> 
> Also, we should add a link to this repo from the main jlreq repo (under Documents).
> 
> And a short description of the aims of the document would be good in the readme (of the jlreq-d repo).
> 
> hth
> ri
> 
> 
> 
> Atsushi Shimono (W3C Team) wrote on 06/06/2022 15:38:
>>
>>
>> On 2022/06/02 23:34, Internationalization Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>>> I18N-ACTION-1157: Create jlreq-d repo
>>>
>>> https://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/1157

>>>
>>> Assigned to: Atsushi Shimono
>>
>>   Created and configured as similar to jlreq at: https://github.com/w3c/jlreq-d/settings/pages

>>
>>   Added skelton-ish files, with blank index.html. I believe JL-TF will mostly use issues for
>> a while. (and/or bulk memos in /docs/ as similar to jlreq repository.)
>