- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:12:42 +0900
- To: "Lieske, Christian" <christian.lieske@sap.com>
- CC: public-i18n-its@w3.org
Hi Christian, Lieske, Christian wrote: > Hi Felix, > > Thanks for looking into SVG print. > > Your information on existing SVG provisions which would allow for the use of > ITS is very helpful. > I sympathize with your proposal to attempt an explicit reference to ITS. Do > you > suggest to have this reference bound to SVG (as opposed to "bound SVG > Tiny")? > SVG "full" 1.1. is a recommendation, so it's hard to get changes into it http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/REC-SVG11-20030114/ SVG "full" 1.2 is not in a stable state, AFAIK, see the "status" section http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-SVG12-20050413/ so we can't expect a lot of progress here. SVG tiny is the specification in the SVG area which seems to me likely to make the fastest progress. See again the "status" section at http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/CR-SVGMobile12-20060810/ These are the reasons why I proposed SVG Tiny. Cheers, Felix
Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2008 08:13:02 UTC