- From: Yves Savourel <yves@opentag.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 07:35:56 +0100
- To: <public-i18n-its@w3.org>
Going through Bartosz notes: > BP13: > XSLT standard. The question is - should we point to XSLT 2.0 > (http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-xslt20-20070123/) or XSLT 1.0 > (http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt)? I wonder. Here XSLT is just an example. We probably should have a Bib link to XSLT from the XLST occurence in this section, but I'm not sure if the XSLT link should be in a reference section for this BP. Thoughts anyone? > BP14: > Again Docbook v5.0 Working Draft > (http://www.docbook.org/specs/docbook-5.0CR3-spec-wd-01.html) > or Docbook 4.5 OASIS Standard > (http://www.docbook.org/specs/docbook-4.5-spec.html) > > XHTML - http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/REC-xhtml1-20020801/ Maybe reference to the specific section for <span> and <phrase> rather than the top of the spec? > Additionally, here is the list of links to Kara's articles published > by Globalization Insider: > http://www.lisa.org/globalizationinsider/2003/06/terminology_an_.html > http://www.lisa.org/globalizationinsider/2003/11/the_terms_of_bu.html > http://www.lisa.org/globalizationinsider/2005/07/terminology_get.html > http://www.lisa.org/globalizationinsider/2006/04/terminology_as.html Maybe http://www.lisa.org/globalizationinsider/2003/11/the_terms_of_bu.html which discusses the business case for terminology. I'll add it. Thanks, -yves
Received on Wednesday, 26 December 2007 06:35:46 UTC