- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 05:11:21 +0900
- To: "Lieske, Christian" <christian.lieske@sap.com>
- CC: public-i18n-its@w3.org
Lieske, Christian wrote: > Hi there, > > Here's a modified version of the paragraph. I discovered that the paragraph > is no longer located in section 1.2. It's now part of section 2. > > Cheers, > Christian > === > > Old/existing: > > If you are working with XML Schema, your options depend on whether the > schemas involved define target namespaces (techniques such as working > 'chameleon' or 'proxy' schemas may be considered as solutions in certain > cases). > > New/proposed: > > If you are working with XML Schema, your options depend on whether the > schemas involved define target namespaces. Techniques such as working > 'chameleon' or 'proxy' schemas (see > http://www.xfront.com/ZeroOneOrManyNamespaces.html) may thus not be > applicable if you are for example combining the XML Schema document for ITS > (http://www.w3.org/TR/its/its.xsd) with your own XML Schema. > how about: If you are working with XML Schema, you can only apply the technique of 'chameleon' or 'proxy' schemas (see http://www.xfront.com/ZeroOneOrManyNamespaces.html) if the 'chameleon' schemas have no namespace. For example the XML Schema document for ITS http://www.w3.org/TR/its/its.xsd has a target namespace and thus cannot be a 'chameleon' schema. Felix
Received on Thursday, 18 October 2007 20:12:16 UTC