- From: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@translate.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 09:08:20 -0600
- To: <public-i18n-its@w3.org>
Subject: ITS Teleconf - Wednesday May-23-2007 ============================================= The IRC recoding of the minutes is here: Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-its/2007AprJun/0037.html IRC Log: http://www.w3.org/2007/05/23-i18nits-minutes.html Present: Jirka (IRC), Christian, Yves Regrets: Andrzej, Felix, Sebastian === Review of the action items: Nobody had much time to do a lot of their action items. -01 [NEW]: Felix to check language data type in XML Schema http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#language PENDING -02 [NEW]: Felix to contact JIS people in Japan about possiblity of "ITS as JIS" PENDING -03 [NEW]: Felix to find IBM contact for ITS PENDING -04 [NEW]: Felix to tweak XSLT to generate automatic example numbering and titleing like "Example 7: Better design" PENDING -05 [NEW]: Felix to update status section for each new BP WD publicatation with 1) BP which need review and 2) BP which we think are finished., Ongoing AI PENDING -06 [NEW]: Jirka to draft a mail for contacting editors vendors for ITS PENDING -07 [NEW]: Richard to add more rationale to the "why" section of BP4 PENDING -08 [NEW]: Richard to tweak the "Why doing this" statement from BP 5 PENDING -09 [NEW]: Sebastian to consider whether we need question marks after "Why doing this" statements in the BPs DISCARDED: Yves will ask to handy native speakers. -10 [NEW]: yves to check the whole doc for consistency for "attribute" vs "attribute value" PENDING -11 [NEW]: Yves to contact Diane and to check her availability for editing of the BP document PENDING -12 [NEW]: Yves to provide mail about applying ITS in OpenOffice PENDING -13 [NEW]: Yves to rewrite the description of example 11 PENDING -14 [NEW]: Yves to send mail about f2f meeting in Autumn Done: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-its/2007AprJun/0033.html -15 [NEW]: Yves to talk to Philippe Rouquet about "ITS as ISO" topic Done. Waiting for answer. -16 [NEW]: Christian to draft general section about extending/customizing schemas PENDING -17 [NEW]: Christian to provide sample BP for further discussion. Done during f2f. -18 [NEW]: Christian to rework 4.1 and 4.1.1 PENDING -19 [NEW]: Felix to ask Najib about correcet rendering of example 4 Done. Najib noted that we could just do like we did for the example in the Rec document. -20 [NEW]: Felix to contact Najib and Felix about BP 2 PENDING -21 [NEW]: Felix to provide W3C document lisense to Jirka PENDING -22 [NEW]: Felix to sort out XHTML issues PENDING -23 [NEW]: Jirka and Yves to add conformance statements to the modularization sections PENDING -24 [NEW]: Jirka to fix DocBook issues mentioned by Christian PENDING -25 [NEW]: Jirka to integrate the DocBook section into the BP document PENDING -26 [NEW]: Yves to check whether Diane wants to continue be co-editor PENDING -27 [NEW]: Yves to collect all examples from BP and put them into testsuite PENDING -28 [NEW]: Yves to create draft of CDATA section PENDING -29 [NEW]: Yves to find new formulation for example 29 PENDING -30 [NEW]: Yves to rework some BP according Christian structure PENDING -31 [NEW]: editors of BP document to change the descriptions of ITS+existing schemas to say that there is no need to have ITS attributes for existing markup, and have association rules instead. PENDING -32 [NEW]: Felix to prepare access for Jirka for the BP directory Done. Jirka has access. -33 [NEW]: Yves to contact some ISO people about the "ITS as ISO standard" topic. DSCARDED: Same as #15. -34 [PENDING]: Everybody to look at SPARQL and the SPARQL result format for potential ITS review. PENDING -36 [PENDING]: Everybody to look into XLIFF 1.2, TMX 2, SRX 2 Christian requested 2 more day for the proposed TMX2 comments (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2007AprJun/0029.html) -37 [PENDING]: Everybody to think about the idea: consider to have all existing schemas "ITS+..." with only markup which is not already in the schema, e.g. "ITS+XHTML" without its:dir? And have a general guideline to do that for existing schemas. Done. Led to #31 -38 [PENDING]: Yves to look on Atom and the bidi attribute and possibly ITS in general. PENDING === Discussions -- Reviewing W3C Work for ITS 2 new: Xpath Full Text, and Web services Addressing. CL: Xpath Full Text has probably i18n-related feature. Need Felix guidance for WS adressing. Action: Felix to provide feedback on whether we need to look at XPath 2.0 Req/Use case and Web Service addressing. -- Best Practices Working Draft YS: Latest version is here: http://www.w3.org/International/its/techniques/its-techniques.html We need to do our action items before we can discuss anything. -- Other Business CL: Any feedback from ITS presentation at Xtech? JK: Good to see application using ITS. YS: Got input from someone from the European trademarks bureau: was interested in using it. Someone from Business Object was also interested and noted the absence of a data category about 'preserve or not spaces'. YS: Will write a report on the conference and will post in in member list as FYI. -- Next Face to face: YS: Jirka has checked possibility: it would be OK. We need to make sure Andrzej and Sebastian have a chance to think about it. If no one disagree we could probably make it official next meeting. CL: An idea, maybe we could have half a day reserved for tool vendors o discuss implementation? YS: sounds like a good idea. Will discuss it when preparing the agenda. Meeting adjourned. -end-
Received on Wednesday, 23 May 2007 15:08:06 UTC