- From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
- Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 12:16:48 +0100
- To: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- CC: public-i18n-its@w3.org
- Message-ID: <458BBEA0.5060502@kosek.cz>
Felix Sasaki wrote: Hi Felix, thanks for addressing my comments. Please find bellow my further comments. > The most of > examples specify its:version, but example 10 doesn't have its:version > defined anywhere on ancestors of <title its:translate...> element. I > think that reasonable approach would be to require its:version on > element itself or on one if its ancestors. > >> ITSWG: We think that the mechanism described at > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/CR-its-20061102/#its-version-attribute is > sufficient and makes it easier to search for version information (only > two elements, its:rules or the root element need to be checked for *all* > ITS markup) than the ancestor approach you are suggesting (with that > approach you would need to check ancestors for each local ITS markup and > for rules element). Yes, I understand. But with this approach it is not possible to scan ITS markup in a streaming mode -- for example, on example 10 there is its:translate before its:version. I don't know whether ability to read document in a streaming mode is essential requirement for ITS, but to me it seems strange that you must do look-ahead on the its:translate attribute to find which version of ITS is used. > You are using simple XLink links and you reference XLink 1.0 > specification. However XLink 1.0 requires specification of link type > (xlink:type="simple") even for simple links. XLink 1.1 which is under > development removes this constraint by saying that if there is no link > type specified, simple link is assumed. So you probably want to > reference XLink 1.1 instead. > >> ITSWG: Thank you for this suggestion, we will change the ODD document > and use xlin:type="simple". We can't reference XLink 1.1 easily since it > is not a Recommendation yet. Yes, but OTOH requiring users to type xlink:type="simple" seems as a little bit overkill. For example SVG or DocBook 5 already use XLink and they don't require xlink:type. Maybe you could contact authors of XLink 1.1 and see whether this document could be made recommendation before ITS reaches this status also. Jirka -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Jirka Kosek e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz http://www.kosek.cz ------------------------------------------------------------------ Profesionální školení a poradenství v oblasti technologií XML. Podívejte se na náš nově spuštěný web http://DocBook.cz Podrobný přehled školení http://xmlguru.cz/skoleni/ ------------------------------------------------------------------ Nejbližší termíny školení: ** XML pro vývojáře 19.-22.3.2007 ** XML schémata 16.-18.4.2007 ** ** XSL-FO 15.-16.5.2007 ** DocBook 26.-28.6.2007 ** ------------------------------------------------------------------ http://xmlguru.cz Blog mostly about XML for English readers ------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Friday, 22 December 2006 11:17:08 UTC