- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 13:33:09 +0900
- To: fsasaki@w3.org, Yves Savourel <yves@opentag.com>
- Cc: "'Sebastian Rahtz'" <sebastian.rahtz@oucs.ox.ac.uk>, public-i18n-its@w3.org
I agree, too. I also think that by using modes, one can avoid the restrictions of patters. Regards, Martin. At 22:01 06/12/07, Felix Sasaki wrote: > >On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 05:55 -0700, Yves Savourel wrote: >> I agree. > >+1. > >Felix > >> -ys >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: public-i18n-its-request@w3.org >[mailto:public-i18n-its-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Sebastian Rahtz >> Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 2:16 AM >> To: Felix Sasaki >> Cc: public-i18n-its@w3.org >> Subject: Re: What is possible in XSLT patterns >> >> >> I incline to the view that we should recommend using the simpler subset >of XPath, but not mandate it; and leave it to XSLT-based >> implementations to trap the situation and if necessary fail if they >detect patterns they cannot process. But also that we should >> stick to the subset of patterns in our test data and examples. >> >> Sebastian >> >> #-#-# Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University #-#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp
Received on Tuesday, 12 December 2006 05:14:41 UTC